Proudly Serving Clients Throughout California
Basic Requirements For Meal Periods In California

Join us in the fight for workers' rights. Get in touch today.

Basic Requirements for Meal Periods in California

California law states that employers must provide at least a thirty-minute meal period to their employees when their work period is greater than five hours, or greater than six hours for those in the motion picture industry. If during this 30-minute meal period the employee is expected to perform any duties or is not allowed to leave the employer’s premises, the meal period is to be considered “on duty” and must be paid for at the employee’s regular rate.

If you cannot leave your work premises for your meal period, it is not a meal period and you likely must be paid meal period premium pay of one hour for each time you could not leave your work premises for a meal period.

So-called “on duty” meal periods are only allowed if the nature of the work keeps the employee from being removed of all duties and when the employer and employee have a written agreement regarding an on-the-job-meal.

The test to determine whether or not the nature of work keeps an employee from being relieved of their duties is objective. Employers and employees may not agree to an on-the-job meal plan if, based on objective testing, the standard that any employee would have not been able to have been relived from duty is not met.

Some jobs that fit in the category of impermissible “on duty” meals include a singular worker at a kiosk, the only worker in an all night convenience store, or a security guard at a remote station by himself.

Our Notable Class Action Cases

  • Ayala v. Terminix International, Inc.
  • Bankwitz v. Ecolab Inc. - Territory Manager Overtime Lawsuit
  • Bautista v. Alliance Environmental Group
  • Berry v. DCOR, LLC
  • Bognuda v. Great White Dental
  • Campos v. Ecolab Inc. – California Route Sales Manager (RSM) Lawsuit
  • Candete v. Cummins Transportation
  • Cooper v. Ecolab Inc.
  • Derousseau v. Schlumberger Technology Corporation
  • Dietz v. Ecolab Inc.
/

What Makes Strauss & Strauss APC Different

  • We Don't Give Up

    If we don't get a favorable ruling the first time around, we work hard to appeal cases to ensure we do everything we can for your case.

  • We Exclusively Represent Employees

    We fight on behalf of employees only and are not afraid of going up against the largest corporations in the country, if not the world.

  • We Think Outside of the Box

    Our seasoned team of attorneys come up with innovative solutions unheard of in the past in order to advance their cases in court.

  • Over $100 Million Recovered

    In the last decade, Strauss & Strauss APC has recovered over $100 million dollars for employees in California.

We Seek Justice for Employees Throughout California